Light ROM 4/Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso/text/maillist/1995/1095.doc/000120_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Tue Oct 3 08:36:47 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA153924607; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:36:47 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail.global1.net by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA153824590; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:36:30 -0700
Received: from shell.global1.net ([e-mail] [198.69.121.31]) by mail.global1.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA22268 for <[e-mail]>; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 11:28:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 11:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Sparks for Intel!
In-Reply-To: <n1399406955.95538@wb mail server>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk


> >>... the Amiga user who believes that the plug-ins should be made for
> >>every platform LW works on.

Would Amiga users be willing to PAY for these plug-ins though??

In other words, if a developer came out with a plug-in for the PC version
of LightWave and charged $100 for it and then decided to release a copy
of that same plug-in for the Amiga market, which probably has one tenth
as many LW users as the PC market, would Amiga users be willing to pay
$1,000 to make it worth the developers time?  What if the plug-ins were
only 2 or 3 times as much?

The huge number of PC users out there is the reason that developers can
sell hardware/software so cheaply for the PC....and the dwindling number
of (buying) Amiga users is why prices are skyrocketing for the Amiga.


                                     -David Warner

--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]